Back to Insights

Winning by Losing in Early-Stage Investing

Blog Post

One of our limited partners recently asked, “What are the normal failure rates for early-stage venture capital investments?” After digging through our data, we estimate that early-stage fund losses range between approximately 35% and 70%.

How did we determine this? We reviewed 20 funds that made early stage investments between 2006 and 2011.  Among this group, which invested in more than 500 companies, 45% of their investments failed to return 100% of capital, while 34% returned less than half. The median loss rate was 39%, the median multiple on invested capital (MOIC) was 1.9x, and the internal rate of return (IRR) was 13%.

Admittedly, there was an element of dispersion in our results (see correlation chart below). In the case of two top performers, for example, “Fund A,” a 2007 vintage, had a 4.4x MOIC and a 66% loss rate, while “Fund B,” a 2008 vintage, had a 5.8x MOIC and a 38% loss rate.

That said, we discerned an interesting relationship between losses and returns. At one end of the spectrum, a VC fund with a 67% loss rate, the highest in our data set, returned 0.6x capital. At the other end, a fund with a 14% loss rate, the lowest among them, returned 1.1x capital.

Taken together, these results suggest that funds with loss rates near the lower or upper bands of the 35%-70% range tend to underperform because they take too little or too much risk, respectively.

To see if our hypothesis was on target, we compared our results to those reported by others, including Adams Street Partners. They concluded that 55% of invested capital was allocated to losing deals, with a capital-weighted loss rate of 45%.

Cambridge Associates conducted its own research and published results that were somewhat similar, as illustrated by the chart below.

We compared the various findings above to those from a 2013 analysis of Union Square Ventures funds by Fred Wilson (who has also written about the losses and returns at his AVC blog). He reported that USV’s top-performing 2004 fund had a loss rate of 40%, near the lower end of our range. Perhaps not surprisingly, that loss rate was consistent with that of Fund B, detailed earlier.

Finally, we note the work of our friend Trevor Kienzle’s firm, Correlation Ventures, which analyzed 21,000 financings for the period 2004-2013. They found that 64% of all VC investments lose money.


Simply put, venture funds should be taking risk to generate acceptable returns. Based on past experience, a loss ratio between 35% and 70% would seem to signal a healthy balance between risk and reward. No one likes to see losses, of course, but it is important that LPs not be fixated on investments that don’t work out. Great managers, like great athletes, should be able to deliver good results by remaining consistent, focused and disciplined, regardless of the (expected) hiccups along the way.

Needless to say, that doesn’t mean risk management is unimportant. There are various tactics that managers can employ to optimize returns when bad outcomes are inevitable. These include recycling proceeds from earlier realized losses and maintaining sufficient dry powder to take on a more concentrated exposure in high-performing investments.

(Note: for more insights on the loss-return relationship, please read Venture Outcomes Are Even More Skewed Than You Think at Seth Levine’s VC Adventure, and Venture Capital Disrupts Itself: Breaking the Concentration Curse by Cambridge Associates.)

The views set forth herein are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Industry Ventures. The information and views expressed are generic in nature, and is not an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to purchase interests in any investments or services. Certain information contained in this article may constitute “forward-looking statements.” Any projections or other estimates contained herein, including estimates of returns or performance, are “forward looking statements” and are based upon certain assumptions that may change. Due to various risks and uncertainties, actual events or results may differ materially from those reflected or contemplated in such forward-looking statements. There can be no assurance that the forward-looking statements made herein will prove to be accurate, and issuance of such forward-looking statements should not be regarded as a representation by Industry Ventures, or any other person, that the objective and plans of Industry Ventures will be achieved. All forward-looking statements made herein are based on information presently available to the management of Industry Ventures and Industry Ventures does not undertake to update any forward-looking statement that may be made from time to time by or on behalf of Industry Ventures.

This material does not constitute financial, investment, tax or legal advice (or an offer of such advisory services) and should not be viewed as advice or recommendations (or an offer of advisory services).

Certain information contained in this article (including certain forward-looking statements and information) has been obtained from published sources and/or prepared by other parties, which in certain cases has not been updated through the date hereof. While such sources are believed to be reliable, neither Industry Ventures and any general partner affiliated with Industry Ventures or any of its respective directors, officers, employees, partners, members, shareholders, or their affiliates, or any other person, assumes any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of such information.